Congressman Broun To Introduce Constitutional Amendment To Ban Same-Sex Marriages
Story Published:
May 20, 2008 at 1:23 PM EDT
Story Updated:
May 20, 2008 at 1:25 PM EDT
Georgia Congressman Paul Broun announced Tuesday that he will be introducing a constitutional amendment to prevent same-sex marriage in response to a recent decision by the California Supreme Court that recognizes same-sex marriages.
The recent 4-3 decision by the California Supreme Court redefines marriage to include legal unions. Some conservative legal scholars view the recent decision as activist in which the policy preferences of four justices overturned the democratically expressed will of California’s voters.
“Marriage as an institution exists solely between one man and one woman. Americans have traditionally recognized this definition as being the most beneficial arrangement for the creation of stable family structures and for the upbringing of children. In fact, Americans have repeatedly shown their preference for the traditional definition of one-man, one-woman marriage by passing state and federal laws or by amending state constitutions to preserve the traditional definition," Broun said.
“There simply is no basis for the suggestion that homosexual ‘marriage’ is a right protected by the United States Constitution," Broun said.
In 2004, President Bush announced his support for such an amendment, after judges in various parts of the country ordered marriage licenses to be available to same-sex couples, despite the Defense of Marriage Act having previously been signed by President Bill Clinton in the 1990's.
The proposed amendment has an uphill battle, though, as both the U.S. House and Senate must approve by a two-thirds vote. If that were to happen, then three-fourths of state legislatures would have to approve the amendment before it becomes law.
Perhaps the biggest hurdle the amendment faces is Democrats. Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean was pleased with the decision of the California Supreme Court.
"The Supreme Court of California today took a step forward in the long march toward protecting equal rights under the law for every American. This should not be a matter of politics or partisanship; it is a matter of protecting the rights and dignity of all American families," Dean said on May 15.
Democrats hold the majority in both the House and Senate.
Congressman Broun serves Georgia's 10th congressional district, which includes part of the Augusta area.
More Good Stuff
User Agreement
The following comments do not necessarily represent the views of NBC Augusta 26 | news, weather, sports, community, entertainment, shopping for Augusta, Georgia. Users have agreed to these terms and in doing so accept full responsibility for their comments. Moderation is limited.
Wednesday, May 21 at 1:46 PM Dan Valdes wrote ...
I think Paul Broun should lose his job and I will actively participate in seeing that come re-election time, he does just that.
4027704Wednesday, May 21 at 5:37 PM Julius wrote ...
It's time for Congressman Broun to grow up and realize that civil marriage licenses are the issue here. If his church (if he belongs to one) wants to continue separating gay people from non-gay people in the marriage arena, it can continue to do so. The constitution is not the place to play politics and his grandstanding simply will not pay off for him.
4033059Thursday, May 22 at 6:10 AM Jessica King wrote ...
Typical. They're terrified about November. What to do? Bring up gay marriage, of course. Get all the votes riled up about "the gays." Mr. Broun, tell me this. Was is planned or just coincidental that you made this big announcement coincided with your vote AGAINST OUR VETS on the new GI Bill? I would bet you a nice campaign contribution that the people who vote for you know a lot more veterans than gays. Please explain this to your constituents at Fort Gordon. You're a disgrace. VOTE FOR SAXON!
4040389Tuesday, May 27 at 2:05 AM Kudos to Congressman Broun wrote ...
WE need more politicians with the temerity of Congressman Broun. This is about an agenda to redifine marriage. To define a person via their sexual preference. At any other time in history it would have been seen for what it is...absurd. The people overwhelmingly vote it down when put to a vote. yet that doesn't seem to matter. This is beyond a religious issue. It goes against what has been clearly understood since the dawn of mankind.
4108374Friday, May 30 at 1:26 PM B2 Sad day for Georgia wrote ...
The sad fact is that Congressman Braun may do well on this issue for now, but generations from now our children are going to look back and wonder, why. Why did our parents fight human rights? Why did our parents stand in the way of two people coming together to form a family? Times are changing the war drums of yesterday are losing muster and I hope you take note Congressman. Conservative principles DO NOT support gay marriage bans. They are in direct confrontation with states rights.
4184824Saturday, Jun 7 at 8:24 PM Mike Blessing wrote ...
“There simply is no basis for the suggestion that homosexual ‘marriage’ is a right protected by the United States Constitution," Broun said. Show me where heterosexual marriage is defended by the Constitution, or the word "marriage" is even used at all in the Constitution.
4327487Saturday, Nov 8 at 9:54 AM Praying for an Evolved Mind wrote ...
This is more about the infiltration of religion into law than it is about gay rights. The more religion enters law the less freedom for everyone. Check out Iran and Iraq. That is because religion wants to run your personal life. And religion is about the most intolerant force in the world today despite all the lovey-dovey talk they preach. Don't let religion remove our freedoms. As far as marriage being between a man and a woman. Marriage is a man-made concept that can be molded into anything.
12054729Tuesday, Nov 11 at 2:21 AM Marcus wrote ...
Broun is a dangerous, ignorant jack*** that is willing to demagogue the most loony and insane s**t to distract people. Now hes calling Obama a communist who wants to rake over america. he needs to be gone.
12152464Thursday, Nov 13 at 8:48 PM Dillon wrote ...
Congressman Broun should lose his job? For what? For representing the 61% of the popular vote that put him into office because they agree with his stances? Or is it because he disagrees with your personal opinion? Because of that, he should be fired? I find it ironic that pro-gay marriage supporters enjoy calling Christians and conservatives narrow-minded and portray the same ideas themselves. Like it or not, atheism is a faith, it is defended with religious fervor, and is just as divisive
12286049Add a comment
Most Popular